<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Blog.WSG.net &#187; Usability</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.wsg.net/category/usability/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.wsg.net</link>
	<description>Blog &#38; Web Site Design &#38; Development, Internet Marketing, SEO, IT Consulting &#38; Network Support :: Albany, Troy, Schenectady Saratoga NY</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 15:44:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>NY Times: As Browsers Battle&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://blog.wsg.net/2009/03/25/ny-times-as-browsers-battle-consumers-stand-to-win/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.wsg.net/2009/03/25/ny-times-as-browsers-battle-consumers-stand-to-win/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 14:03:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Justin Cresswell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Browser Wars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Usability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[downloads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freeware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet explorer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mozilla]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safari]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.wsg.net/?p=172</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NY Times writer Farhad Manjoo wrote a brief review on the four main web browsers, and the re-started browser wars on today&#8217;s Circuits page.
He ranks Microsoft&#8217;s new Internet Explorer 8, Apple&#8217;s Safari, Google&#8217;s Chrome and Mozilla&#8217;s Firefox &#8211; in that order &#8211; from worst to first.  His viewpoint on Chrome is one I share, and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.wsg.net/files/2009/03/credit-ny-times-and-matt-collins.png"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-181" src="http://blog.wsg.net/files/2009/03/credit-ny-times-and-matt-collins.png" alt="" width="208" height="279" /></a>NY Times writer <a title="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/26/technology/personaltech/26basics.html?_r=1&amp;ref=personaltech&amp;pagewanted=print" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/26/technology/personaltech/26basics.html?_r=1&amp;ref=personaltech&amp;pagewanted=print" target="_blank">Farhad Manjoo wrote a brief review on the four main web browsers, and the re-started browser wars</a> on today&#8217;s Circuits page.</p>
<p>He ranks Microsoft&#8217;s new Internet Explorer 8, Apple&#8217;s Safari, Google&#8217;s Chrome and Mozilla&#8217;s Firefox &#8211; in that order &#8211; from worst to first.  His viewpoint on Chrome is one I share, and which has lasting implications for the future of web browsing.</p>
<p>Chrome handles the big things &#8211; security, scalability, usability &#8211; very well.  The things it doesn&#8217;t handle at the moment &#8211; plugins and addons &#8211; have fixes in the works.  Quoting <a title="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/26/technology/personaltech/26basics.html" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/26/technology/personaltech/26basics.html" target="_blank">Manjoo</a>: &#8220;Google has just outlined a way for coders to create such plug-ins. If programmers start pumping out add-ons, Chrome could be unbeatable.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.wsg.net/2009/03/25/ny-times-as-browsers-battle-consumers-stand-to-win/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Slate.com: How we read online</title>
		<link>http://blog.wsg.net/2008/06/17/slatecom-how-we-read-online/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.wsg.net/2008/06/17/slatecom-how-we-read-online/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 12:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Justin Cresswell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Usability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.wsg.net/?p=86</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Slate.com offers this primer regarding online reading habits.  It mentions Jakob Nielsen, who is well though of around the office, and also links to an academic essay entitled Hamlet&#8217;s BlackBerry: Why Paper Is Eternal.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Slate.com offers this primer regarding <a title="Will open in external window" href="http://www.slate.com/toolbar.aspx?action=print&amp;id=2193552" target="_blank">online reading habits</a>.  It mentions <a href="http://www.useit.com/jakob/" target="_blank">Jakob Nielsen</a>, who is well though of around the office, and also links to an academic essay entitled <a href="http://www.ksg.harvard.edu/presspol/research_publications/papers/discussion_papers/D39.pdf" target="_blank">Hamlet&#8217;s BlackBerry: Why Paper Is Eternal</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.wsg.net/2008/06/17/slatecom-how-we-read-online/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
